Casinos Hate Winners

Casinos Hate Winners

Is There +EV on Prediction Markets?

What to actually buy, based on 72 million trades

Casinos Hate Winners's avatar
Casinos Hate Winners
Apr 18, 2026
∙ Paid

Short answer: yes — but the devil is in the details, as always.

I have two accounts on prediction markets. The first one is purely degenerate. I occasionally throw money at sports, esports, and politics just for fun. There’s probably no real edge there, which is why I do it rarely.

Examples of those impulsive bets

The second account is different. I'm running a hypothesis there: small bets first, scale up if it works. A bot handles all the trades, exclusively on sports events. The logic is dead simple — so simple I suspect a lot of sports bettors are doing the same thing. I'll write about it properly once the experiment reaches a conclusion. For now, here are the interim numbers: nearly 3,000 predictions, ~1% ROI.

2,840 bets, 0.86% ROI

I also had another hunch: bets with 90%+ implied probability should carry a small structural edge, because people chasing big multipliers are on the other side. Turns out this hunch has evidence behind it.

Spoiler: the gap between the best and worst position is 64 percentage points. More on that below.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Casinos Hate Winners.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Casinos Hate Winners · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture